What Happens in 2026 When the EU’s Crypto Grandfathering Period Ends?
As Europe braces for full MiCA enforcement and the end of crypto’s “Wild West” era, regulators, banks, and startups collide in a new era of compliance, AI governance, and digital finance.
As the winter of 2025 settles over the European continent, our industry finds itself in a state of suspended animation. For the past eighteen months, since the initial provisions of the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation came into force, the sector has been operating in a strange, hybrid reality.
Hans
We have seen the first wave of compliance reshape the stablecoin market, and we have watched as global banking giants finally stepped onto the playing field, emboldened by legal clarity.
Yet, despite the progress, the true test has not yet arrived. It is looming on the horizon, visible to everyone but still ignored by many who hope for a last-minute reprieve.
The Stablecoin Purge and Market Bifurcation
To understand the gravity of this moment, we must look back at the transformation the industry has undergone since 2024, specifically regarding the "Stablecoin Purge."
Hans
The first tremors of the MiCA era were felt when regulations governing Asset-Referenced Tokens (ARTs) and E-Money Tokens (EMTs) came into effect.
The European Securities and Markets Authority required Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs) to restrict non-MiCA compliant ARTs and EMTs by Q1 2025, mandating a specific "sell-only" period that concludes on March 31, 2025.
Some exchanges, for instance, executed the removal of non-compliant stablecoins like USDT from its EU services in December 2024 and European users found themselves migrating toward compliant alternatives.
This transition has birthed a curious phenomenon: the bifurcation of global liquidity. We now effectively have two distinct crypto markets: the "Global South and Asia" market, where stablecoins continues to reign supreme as a dollar substitute, and the "Western Regulated" market (EU and increasingly the US), where only transparent, bank-backed stablecoins are permitted.
The "Double License" Trap
While the stablecoin issue has largely been resolved, the broader industry faces a more existential threat in 2026 involving a complex "double license" hurdle.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has clarified that providers dealing with EMTs who also facilitate payment services must secure a second license (either as a payment institution or an electronic money institution, by March 2, 2026).
This requirement catches many crypto firms off guard; simply obtaining a MiCA CASP authorization is no longer sufficient if their business model intersects with traditional payment services.
For the thousands of small to mid-sized crypto service providers currently scrambling to finalize their paperwork, this is the Great Filter.
By the summer of 2026, a binary reality will take hold: either a company is fully authorized under these rigorous dual standards, or it is illegal.
The Institutional Advantage
The most visible consequence of this regulatory tightening has been the entry of traditional finance (TradFi) into the crypto space, capitalizing on the difficulties faced by startups.
Major European institutions are moving aggressively; for example, some of them have been actively integrating crypto services and these institutions possess a massive advantage: they already hold the banking and payment licenses that crypto startups are struggling to obtain by the 2026 deadline.
The End of the "Grandfathering" Era
The importance of July 1, 2026, lies in the activation of the "passporting" mechanism. Once the grandfathering period ends, a CASP license granted in one country becomes valid across the entire European Union.
However, it also means that the "grey market" will vanish. Currently, many firms operate in a legal gray area, soliciting clients across borders based on vague interpretations of local laws. Come July 2026, that gray area turns black and white.
MiCA is a Regulation, not a Directive. Unlike Directives, which require member states to pass their own national bills to enact EU goals, a Regulation is immediately binding upon all signatories of the EU Treaty.
Olivier Acuna
This reality is currently being tested in Poland, where the government has delayed designating a local National Competent Authority (NCA) for licensing and sanctions. While MiCA applies in Poland legally, as they are bound by their accession Treaty, the state has effectively opted out of enforcement within its territory for the time being.
This creates a precarious paradox: a binding international law with no local sheriff. However, this is not a permanent loophole; it is a breach of Treaty obligations.
Basel III — Banks Get the Green Light
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) has fixed 1 January 2026 as the effective date for its crypto‑asset prudential standards. For the first time, banks may hold digital assets directly (only under strict capital and risk‑management conditions).
Tiff Macklem, Chair of the GHOS and Governor of the Bank of Canada
Under the new Basel III framework, tokenized traditional instruments and fully‑backed stablecoins qualify for preferential treatment, while unbacked cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin fall under a 1:1 capital charge, meaning banks must match risk exposure with equivalent capital reserves.
This regulatory clarity gives institutions a “green light” to enter the market, likely fueling the next wave of tokenized deposits, digital bonds, and bank‑issued stablecoins that fit supervisory standards.
The EU AI Act
On a side note, knowing that AI is linked to our industry and vice versa, the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act entered into force in 2024, but 2026 marks the "year of compliance" for most applications.
Hans
The law classifies AI systems according to risk levels. Whilst "prohibited" systems are banned immediately, "high-risk" AI, used in recruitment, education, healthcare, infrastructure, or law enforcement, remains legal only under heavy supervision.
By 2026, developers of high-risk systems must complete conformity assessments, provide traceability logs, and document explainability for every algorithmic decision. The burden is substantial. Large firms can absorb compliance costs, but smaller players and open-source developers may hesitate to release models that could fall under EU jurisdiction without proper certification.
The EU Data Act — Code Meets the Law
Parallel to the AI Act, the EU Data Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/2854) enters active enforcement in early 2026, following its initial applicability in September 2025.
Whilst primarily designed to enhance data-sharing and interoperability, Article 30 introduces obligations for smart-contract developers, including requirements for "safe termination" and "interruption mechanisms", colloquially known as kill switches.
From 2026 onward, regulators will no longer issue warnings but levy fines for non-compliance, adding a concrete financial dimension to code governance. For decentralised-finance projects, this transforms theoretical regulatory risk into enforceable liability.
A hack or failure without an emergency stop option could invite regulatory sanctions, even if the protocol is operated by a DAO.
Hans
The “Immutability” Crisis
This new legal environment challenges one of crypto's founding doctrines, immutability. Because the Data Act mandates that smart contracts controlling access to shared data be stoppable and updatable, truly immutable code becomes non-compliant inside the EU.
In practice, this may result in the delisting of non-compliant DeFi tokens by centralised exchanges, which must protect their licences under MiCA standards.
Global Context
While Europe was the first mover, it is not operating in a vacuum. The regulatory landscape in the United Kingdom and the United States has shifted dramatically in response to MiCA, creating a big movement on global non-compliance.
The United Kingdom
The UK government chose a strategy of being a "smart follower." Rather than rushing to beat the EU, they observed the friction points of MiCA and are rolling out their own crypto regime targeting full implementation by 2026.
Camomile Shumba
This aligns the UK's timeline with the EU's "Great Filter," effectively closing off the British Isles as a refuge for non-compliant firms at the exact same moment the EU doors shut.
The United States
Across the Atlantic, the U.S. has shifted from years of "regulation by enforcement" to a more structured framework. The turning point came with the repeal of the SEC's Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 121 (SAB 121) in early 2025, which had forced banks to treat clients' crypto assets as liabilities on their balance sheets.
By mid-2025, the U.S. Treasury and banking regulators began developing a prudential crypto framework modelled on the EU's MiCA, emphasising investor protection, stablecoin oversight, and regulatory clarity.
This marked the "transition from fear and enforcement to structure and supervision," and indicated that Washington was finally aligning with Brussels on rules for digital finance.
A 2026 Bureaucratized Revolution
Rules, rules and more rules. As we approach 2026, the industry is gaining more legitimacy, but at a steep price: more regulations and perhaps the end of the "crypto punk" ethos of the early days. The idea of a parallel financial system outside the reach of the state has been replaced by a system that is fully integrated into the state.
Yet this integration is not necessarily a defeat. For those who remain, the survivors of the Great Filter, the reward is access to a market of 450 million European consumers, institutional capital flows, and the credibility that comes with regulatory blessing. The wild frontier is closing, but in its place emerges something more durable: a regulated industry that can no longer be dismissed as a speculative sideshow.
The question now is not whether crypto will survive regulation, but what form it will take on the other side. Will the decentralised ethos find new expression within compliant structures, or will it retreat to the unregulated margins of the global economy? The answer will be written in the months ahead, as the final deadlines approach and the industry discovers who it truly is.
Connect with Bitfinity Network
Bitfinity Wallet | Bitfinity Network | Twitter | Telegram | Discord | Github
*Important Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. While we strive for accuracy, Bitfinity makes no representations or warranties regarding the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any outcomes resulting from the use of this information. The content may include opinions and forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, and any reliance on this information is at your own risk.
External links are provided for convenience, and we recommend verifying information before taking any action. Bitfinity is not liable for any direct or indirect losses or damages arising from the use of this information.
Comments ()